āThe patriarchy.ā A word that has bred rage in the hearts of many and lamentation towards the male figures in society. Naturally, the question follows. Has it always been this way?
Has the āpatriarchyā always been an oppressive regime? A conspiracy instigated by the male figures in society to administer iron-fist rule?
Letās tumble down Wonderland.
I KNOW IāM A LITTLE LATE IN THIS , BUT A WHILE BACK YOU TALKED ABOUT SCARIFICATION AND HOW IT WAS A SYMBOL OF OUR SELF-HATE.
I MAY NOT BE QUOTING YOU CORRECTLY BUT ANYWAY.
FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN, I LOOK AT THE SCARS AND I LIKE THEIR APPEARANCE BUT AT THE SAME TIME I AM NOT THE ONE SUFFERING TO RECIEVE THEM SO I UNDERSTAND MY POSITION IN THAT, BUT AT THE SAME TIME I WAS WATCHING A DOCUMENTARY AND IT WAS SHOWING SCARIFICATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN, BOYS, AROUND THE AGES OF 2-4 I THINK.
ANYWAY ONE OF THE PEOPLE INTERVIEWED SPOKE ABOUT HOW IT BRINGS THE CHILDREN INTO REALITY IN THE SENSE THAT IT IS NOT ALWAYS HAPPY.
THIS IS USEFUL TODAY THROUGHOUT THE DIASPRA, BUT I CAN SEE THE RELATION TO COLONIZERS AND MISSIONARIES.
IS THIS JUST A PERVERSION TO A LOST BUT CORRECTLY ORDER RITE OF PASSAGE?
I WANTED TO POINT OUT WHERE I CITED YOU CALLING GOD HIM.
HOW DOES THAT RELATE TO ANCIENT AFRICA?
ARE YOU CALLING GOD A MAN?
I DONāT SEE HOW THAT CONCEPTS RELATES TO OUR ANCESTORS.
DOES YOUR SPIRITUAL SCIENCE RELATE A PATRIARCH?
Iām afraid you did misquote me. Scarification was never a symbol of self-hate. On the contrary, it was out of self-love and love of each other that our people resorted to such an extreme measure. They knew that the slavers desired the most beautiful of our people in order to get the highest prices in the slave market. So they scarred themselves to make themselves ugly. This enabled them to stay with their beloved. Obviously to go to such an extreme is a result of self-love and the desire to survive among oneās own beloved. Later on, when slavery was over, this custom remained even though the real reasons had long been forgotten, because customs, especially old ones, are treated with much reverence. The custodians of customs in each tribe then devised different reasons in order to continue them, and in some places, the customs were modified and made more palatable. So today there are as many different reasons for it as there are tribes.
God is both āhimā and āherā. God is both the Black man and woman. The use of the word āheā is a fault of the English language. Youāll agree that itās cumbersome and distracting to keep saying he/she, so I use he, following convention. When you say, āI donāt see how that concept relates to our ancestorsā, Iām afraid youāre imposing a foreign concept on our ancestors. The arch-deceivers designed their language specifically for this purpose of confusion, so youāre playing right into their hands. This foul language has nothing whatsoever to do with our people. In our language there is only one word for both him and her.
The word is āoā.
It refers to God as he/she is before separating to be born as a Black baby boy or baby girl. But the word also refers to both male and female, because each one is God.
FIRST OFF: LETS NOT BELITTLE EACH OTHER WITH HE SAID SHE SAID. EVERYTHING I PRESENTED WAS COMPLETELY HYPOTHETICAL IN NATURE. I WAS NOT TRYING TO IMPOSE ANY FORIEGN CONCEPT(S) ON OUR ANCESTORS. I WAS MORE OR LESS CHECKING TO SEE WHERE YOUR HEAD WAS AT.
YOUR DECISION TO USE HIM FOR GOD IS THE SAME ONE A BROTHER OF MINE USES.
I HAVENāT BEEN PRESENTED WITH THE IDEA OF THE 25-35,000 YEAR REIN(S). FROM MY RESEARCH I HAVE FOUND THAT THEIR IS NO PROFOUND REASON FOR WHILE MATRIARCHS ARE MORE COMMON IN THE ANCIENT WORLD THAN PRESENT AND THAT IS SOLELY BECAUSE THE CHILD PASSES THROUGH THE MOTHERS WOMB THUS SO WILL THE LINEAGE. THE ANCESTORS USED A COMMON SENSE APPROACH. THE ANCIENT IDEA OF LINEAGE IS NOT ONE OF POWER BUT ONE OF ORDER AND BALANCE.
THE COMMON ACCEPTED CONCEPTS OF EITHER STYLE OF LINEAGE ARE MORE THAN OFTEN EURO IN NATURE.
FINALLY I WANTED TO ADMITT THAT IāVE NEVER BEEN PRESENTED WITH YOUR IDEA ON THE 24 ELDERS.
IāM FAMILIAR WITH THE 36 NETERS OF KMT.
Any appearance that Iām trying to belittle is just that: an appearance. It would be foolish of me to belittle any Black person while trying to remind other Black people how great they are.
On the question of patriarchies, our society indeed did have patriarchies and matriarchies. Each one lasted for 25,000 years, after which the entire society reversed all its customs and adopted the other system. This is because our system of government is set up in such a way that the 24 Elders alternate when they rotate the leadership. In other words, the rule of each King, which lasts for 25,000 years, is immediately followed by that of a Queen, for the same length of time. So the people live under a patriarchy for 25,000 to 35,000 years, after which they live under a matriarchy for the same length of time, because 12 of the Elders are women and 12 are men.
I hope Iāve made it clearer.
BLKROOTS, I KNOW THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ANSWER EVERYONEāS QUESTION AS ASAP THEREFORE, I WAIT PATIENTLY ON A REPLY ABOUT BLACK HOLES. JUST A REMINDER.
PEACE!
Your question is still top priority.
The topic of black holes is very involved, though. I have to talk first about cosmology in general, and how suns are created, and how they then become black holes. This will be a few weeks down the line, but Iāll do it.
THANKS FOR THE CONTINUED EDUCATION. AGAIN, I HOPE IāM NOT MISINTERPRETING YOU, BUT HOW WAS BALANCE MAINTAINED AMONG THE ANCIENTS DURING THE TIMES OF EITHER PATRIARCHAL OR MATRIARCHAL RULE?
IT WOULD SEEM THAT THINGS COULD BECOME SPECIFICALLY ONE-SIDED DURING THE EITHER/OR PERIODS.
WOULDNāT THIS HAVE BEEN DETRIMENTAL TO SOME DEGREE AS OPPOSED TO A MORE BALANCED, SIMULTANEOUS SHARING OF POWER?
FORGIVE ME FOR THINKING IN THE WESTERN MODE OF PATRIARCHAL/MATRIARCHAL RELATIONS, BUT I MEAN HOW WOULD THE END OF SUCH AN EXTENSIVE ERA COME ABOUT----PEACEFULLY OR UNDER WAR CONDITIONS?
PEACE.
When a King hands over rule to a Queen, all the female Judges are trained for about 100 years by the Queen of their tribe and initiated into all the new rituals. The Judges then initiate new custodians of rituals in every town. This entire process lasts for 1,400 years, and is deliberate and meticulous. It does not involve any kind of strife at all because it has been going on back and forth for countless trillions of years, ever since it was established by the B8M original Gods. Now when the transition is complete, the youngest generation is raised under this matriarchal system, while the rest of the population continues to perform patriarchal rituals (except, of course, those rituals that are gender specific, meaning for women only or for men only. Those never change.)
After 6,000 years, all the older generations have passed away and the first generation to be raised under a matriarchy are now the oldest generation. There is not a single person left on earth other than the leaders who remembers anything at all about the old patriarchal system. The matriarchy continues for 25,000 years as if the earth had always been that way, until a King takes over the crown. Then the opposite occurs, a new patriarchy is established and lasts for another 25,000 years.
The concept of balance was viewed differently then than it is now. To our ancestors the law of balance is the law of the pendulum, which swings one way and then the other. Our lifespan is too short to observe the fairness of this law. The ancients were so long lived that to them balance meant a totally different thing.
Each King or Queen who rules the earth has to fulfill a purpose unique to him or her. No two rulers have the same purpose. Altogether there are 24 purposes lasting for 700,000 years. The 24 purposes of society come in two versions, 12 male purposes and 12 female. Each one is the manifestation of one of the two aspects of God, either the male or female aspect.
In order for each King to fulfill the mission of his Kingdom, he must swing the pendulum all the way to the extreme in the form of a patriarchal society. The same is true with the Queen.
The reason for this is that it would be impossible to manifest certain attributes of the male aspect of God if the King did not have 100% power over the whole nation. If he shared power evenly with the Queen in the balanced way you suggested, it would be impossible for him to fulfill his mission. He would be hindered by objections from the Queen when it came to fulfilling certain plans that are contrary to a womanās nature.
Iām speaking in general terms to illustrate very specific things. But Iāll give you an example.
Right now we are in the 15,000th year of a patriarchal system. The King of our earth has 10,000 years more to rule. He has absolute power on all important matters. If he did not, it would not have been possible to make the light races. Such an evil being would not have been made if the Queens had a say in it, because the turmoil, disruption and evil that was foreseen goes against the feminine nature, which is gentle and peace-loving.
Similarly there are certain feminine aspects of God that must be manifested as well, that a King would not think of on his own. In the end, the extreme female aspects of God always balance those of his male nature.
My explanation above would perhaps give the impression that there is disagreement between the ruling King and his Queen, or the ruling Queen and her King.
Such is not the case.
The Elders are always united in purpose, as they are always of one mind and heart. But this is not the case in all people.
The ordinary people are in varying stages of reaching the perfection of divine unity in which the Elders live. The mission and purpose of every King and Queen ultimately depends on the co-operation of the ordinary people in order to be fulfilled.
When the King or Queen has absolute, unquestioned power in a patriarchy or matriarchy, itās not only easier but also efficient, in that his or her plans will be executed to the smallest detail. Obviously our system has endured forever because the rulers are the personification of goodness itself, otherwise it would be a dictatorship.
That, in brief, is the real reason for long-lasting matriarchies and patriarchies.
Having said all that, Iād suggest that it would be a mistake to evaluate our ancient system using the present form of white patriarchy for comparison. Our system has nothing in common with theirs.
They use patriarchy for domination. To them itās an excuse to oppress the woman, whereas to the ancients itās an opportunity to reveal the male nature of God, which is always good.
